Result: An agreed Stipulation was approved on January 12, 2018 imposing a civil penalty of $2,500 with $1,250 suspended. Violation: A former Community Colleges of Spokane supervisor may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used the College purchase card to make purchases that were personal in nature. Violation: A Department of Social and Health Services employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources and a state provided computer to copy and distribute inappropriate jokes to coworkers via hardcopy and e-mail. Violation: An employee with the University of Washington may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used the agency's computer to access non-work-related sites on a recurring basis that was more than de minimis in nature. Result: Settlement approved on April 9, 2004 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $1,000. Violation: Athletic Director at Bellevue College may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they scheduled Bellevue College gym rentals for their private interest groups and received a special privilege in regard to these personal outside business interests. endstream endobj 16 0 obj <>>>/Filter/Standard/Length 128/O(}ud/mJ "`:gim)/P -3388/R 4/StmF/StdCF/StrF/StdCF/U(\)8q*W^Gn )/V 4>> endobj 17 0 obj <> endobj 18 0 obj <>/MediaBox[0 0 612 792]/Parent 13 0 R/Resources<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Rotate 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page>> endobj 19 0 obj <>stream Violation: A former employee with the Department of Social and Health Services may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to promote their private outside business. Result: Settlement approved on May 9, 2014 for a civil penalty of $10,000 with $2,500 suspended. Violation: A former Unemployment Specialist with Employment Security Department violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they stored an excessive amount of personal data on their state computer, including pictures, music, movies and documents. Result: Settlement approved on November 13, 2009 for a Civil penalty of $6,500 with $1,500 suspended. WebThe Executive Ethics Board enforces the Ethics In Public Service Act, RCW 42.52. Violation: An employee of Washington State Ferries may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to conduct internal union business. Result: A Final Order of Default was entered on May 14, 2021 imposing a civil penalty of $1,000. Result: An Order of Default was entered on November 13, 2020 imposing a civil penalty of $1,000. Result: Settlement approved on September 10, 2004 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $5,000. Evidence also indicated that they had a private interest in vendors and potential vendors used by the School of Dentistry. Result: Settlement approved on April 10, 2009 for a Civil penalty of $250. Result: Settlement approved on April 20, 2001 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $1,000 with $500 suspended. Violation: An employee of the Department of Social and Health Services may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by using state resources for their personal benefit when they submitted false mileage reimbursement claims and when they took time off from work without submitting the proper leave requests. Violation: Chief Administration and Human Resource Officer with Community Colleges of Spokane may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by hiring their son for a part-time hourly job within the Human Resources Department. Result: A settlement was approved on November 18, 2016 imposing a civil penalty of $1,000 with $500 suspended. Result: A Stipulated agreement was entered on July 10, 2020 imposing a civil penalty of $4,000. Result: Settlement approved on April 9, 1999 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $2,000 with $1,000 suspended and an additional $2,000 restitution to the agency. Violation: An employee with the Department of Social and Health Services may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used their state computer to browse the internet for non-work-related purposes. Violation: An employee of the Department of Social and Health Services may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources for their personal outside business as a sports official. Result: A Final Order was issued on December 2, 2013. CALENDAR OF EVENTS March 10 Executive Ethics Board Meeting March 13 Result: Settlement approved on September 13, 2002 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $1,500 with $1,000 suspended. They also used instant message services to communicate with family members. Violation: A Washington State University employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by using state resources for their personal benefit in regard to their personal business. Result: Settlement approved on September 12, 2003 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $750 with $250 suspended. Violation: A Department of Transportation employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to create personal documents relating to an ice-skating organization they were affiliated with, to draft personal financial reports, loan amortization documents, party announcements and freelance stories from a TV series. Violation: A Department of Fish and Wildlife employee agreed that they may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they failed to pay for parking on Capital Campus for approximately one-year. Violation: Professor with the School of Educational Studies at the University of Washington, may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by including a link to a book they authored in their official University of Washington signature block. Result: Settlement approved on September 8, 2017 with a civil penalty of $4,000 with $1,000 suspended. Result: A Final Order of Default was entered on July 10, 2020 imposing a civil penalty of $4,000. Violation: A Data Support Unit Manager with the Department of Health, may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by requiring all staff to participate in team meetings where they played games using unauthorized software. Violation: A former Department of Social and Health Service, Developmental Disability Division employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they worked simultaneously for a private non-profit organization during their scheduled state work hours. Violation: A University of Washington Athletic Director may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they approved contracts and outside compensation for two University football coaches and agreed that the college would pay investigative costs associated with an ethics complaint against one of the coaches. Evidence showed nearly 94 hours of personal interest internet browsing over a ten-week period as well as extensive personal email use. Result: Settlement approved on September 9, 2005 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $250 with $150 suspended. Evidence indicated that they had been receiving additional compensation to conduct contract work that was part of her administrative duties. Violation: A former Maintenance Mechanic with PARKS may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they misappropriated funds involving a purchasing card and a fuel card resulting in losses to the state over $16,000. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on September 9, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $3,250. Result: Settlement approved on July 16, 2013 for a civil penalty of $2,500 with $1,500 suspended. Prison hearings are the means by which the Board decides if an inmate (as defined here) should be released from prison. Result: Settlement approved on September 8, 2000 with a Letter of Instruction. Evidence indicated that they accessed confidential information and shared that information with someone outside the agency and accessed the internet for personal use. In addition, they failed to submit leave for time taken off work and used the college credit card for personal purchases. Violation: The Executive Director of The Evergreen State College, Tacoma Campus may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state their state computer for personal benefit and used their state issued cell phone to make personal phone calls. Violation: A former Department of Corrections employee was found to have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by using state resources (agency time, computer and email) during work hours to work on their college coursework and to manage their vacation rental property. The amount includes $1,500 for investigative costs. Evidence indicated that they failed to submit leave for at least 53 hours during a 12-month review period. Violation: An employee with the Department of Social and Health Services may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources for private gain by using the state's underground parking garage to store personal vehicles. Violation: A Department of Transporation employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to send or receive email and repeatedly visited websites unrelated to their official duties. Violation: A former Department of Personnel employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they made excessive phone calls and conducted business for an outside dance academy and photography studio. Result: A Final Order was issued on October 10, 2019 imposing a civil penalty of $4,000. Result: An agreed settlement was approved on September 9, 2016 imposing a civil penalty of $8,000 with $4,000 suspended. Attempting or conspiring to commit one of the following violations, or aiding and abetting another to commit one of the following violations, shall be considered the same as committing the violation, with the exception of attempting an aggravated assault. Result: Settlement approved on September 12, 2003 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $500. Violation: An Employment Security Division employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used their state computer to pursue personal matters, to include sending personal documents and using the agency's address on their car registration. Result: Settlement approved on March 14, 2014 for a civil penalty of $750. Violation: Maintenance Technician with the Washington State Department of Transportation may have violated RCW 42.52, the Ethics in Public Service Act, by being present at a rally in Shelton while in on-call status in the Olympia region and attached a Blue Lives Matter flag to his state vehicle. Violation: The Lieutenant Governor may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used and authorized the use of their office, directly and indirectly, for the purpose of assisting a campaign in opposition to a ballot proposition. Violation: A former Corrections Specialist with the Department of Corrections may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they took personal time away from work without submitting the proper leave slips. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on January 14, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $3,000 with $1,000 suspended. Violation: Seattle Community College employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used their state SCAN access and state issued cell phone to make personal call and pursue personal interests. Violation: A Warehouse Operator Supervisor with the Department of Corrections may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they accepted a gift from an agency contracted vendor. Following an appeal in Thurston County Superior Court the penalty was reduced to $5,000. Result: A settlement was approved on September 8, 2017 imposing a civil penalty of $2,000 with $1,000 suspended. Result: Settlement approved on October 13, 2006 for a Civil penalty of $1,000. Violation: An employee with the Washington Military Department's Emergency Management Department may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources for personal benefit. Evidence indicated that they synched one or more of personal devices and personal Google account to their work computer and browsed the internet for private benefit to include bill pay, shopping, Facebook and personal email. Violation: An employee with the Emergency Management Division with the Military Department may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to track personal finances and visited hundreds of websites that were not work related. Result: Settlement approved on January 11, 2001 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $1,000 with $600 suspended and an additional $1,000 restitution to the agency. Violation: A Deputy Director with the Washington Traffic Safety Commission may have violated the Act by using state resources for personal benefit and gain by using resources to further their outside business interests and for working on continuing education not related to their job duties. Evidence indicated that spent an excessive amount of time using two different browsers to access the internet for private benefit to include Madden Football, Fantasy Football, music and gaming sites. Evidence indicated that they had an outside relationship with a vendor that they approved purchases from at higher prices and allowed the vendor onto state property to provide service to DNR employee personal vehicles, providing them a special privilege. April 29, 2021 Story Gov. And yet, as of May 4, 2021 five months after the introduction of these vaccines only 6,096 people in custody have received even a single dose The Board also issued a Letter of Reprimand. Violation: A Criminal Justice and Psychology Faculty member at Big Bend College agreed that they may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used the state email system in support of their political campaign for city council. WebWhen someone makes a complaint about a potential violation, they help us protect the people of Washington. Result: Settlement approved on July 11, 2014 for a civil penalty of $1,500 and an additional $1,170 in restitution to the Department of Social and Health Services. Result: Final order approved on August 25, 2009 for a Civil penalty of $15,600 and investigative costs in the amount of $804.58. Violation: A Seattle Community College District employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used their state computer to send an email to all faculty and staff at four campuses referencing their political campaign. Evidence indicated that they were using state computer resources and time to conduct university coursework. endstream endobj startxref Violation: A former employee of Bates Technical College may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they hired their spouse to teach classes at Bates and, in turn, their spouse hired them to teach classes at Pierce College. 2014 of a Letter of Instruction. Violation: A former Office Manager used the state credit card to charge personal expenses and created fraudulent monthly credit card statements to conceal the activity. Result: Settlement approved on September 14, 2012 for a civil penalty of $250. Board issued a Letter of Instruction. Result: Settlement approved on January 11, 2013 for a civil penalty of $4,000 with $2,000 suspended. Violation: A Central Washington University employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to draft a letter to members of Congress regarding their campaign and loan forgiveness, sent over 2,200 emails regarding loan forgiveness and initiated a lobbying campaign to enact federal legislation to forgive student loans for TRIO employees. Result: Final Order issued on April 9, 2012 for a Civil penalty of $12,500. Violation: An employee of the Employment Security Department may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources for personal interests. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on May 14, 2021 imposing a civil penalty of $4,500. Result: Settlement approved on July 13, 2012 for a civil penalty of $3,000 with $1,500 suspended. Under federal law, the U.S. Attorney Generals Office has the authority to file civil actions against law enforcement agencies for engaging in a pattern or practice of civil rights violations. Result: Settlement approved on September 13, 2013 for a civil penalty of $3,000 with $1,000 suspended. Violation: A Corrections Specialist with the Department of Corrections, may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by using their position to secure special privileges and using state resources for private benefit or gain. Result: Settlement approved on September 13, 2013 for a civil penalty of $2,500 with $1,750 suspended. The Board exercises these powers and duties by conducting hearings according to rules and regulations codified in WAC 381 . Result: A Stipulated agreement was approved on July 14, 2017 imposing a civil penalty of $2,000 with $1,000 suspended. Evidence indicated that over a five-month period they accessed the internet for personal use at least once on 93 different days. Corrections is thankful to the Tribes for caring for these lands since time immemorial and honors its ongoing connection to these communities past, present and future. The Board also issued a Letter of Instruction. Violation: An Evergreen State College employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they did not appropriately request leave for absences from work totaling 200 hours. Result: Settlement approved on April 9, 2004 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $500. Violation: A Department of Corrections supervisor took time off from work without submitting the proper leave slips and allowed a subordinate to take time off without requiring them to submit leave for their time off. Evidence also found that they entered into a personal contract with a film company for the production of a motion picture based upon the Canine Connection program at Echo Glen in which they would be paid directly by the film company. Result: An Order and Judgment was approved on November 12, 2010 for a Civil penalty of $500. The community corrections officer shall report to the secretary all facts and circumstances and the reasons for the action of suspending community custody status. Result: An agreed Stipulation was entered on September 14, 2018 imposing a civil penalty of $250. Result: Settlement approved on October 12, 2007 for a Civil penalty of $2,500. Result: A settlement agreement was approved on March 24, 2017 imposing a civil penalty of $2,500 with $1,250 suspended. Result: Settlement approved on November 18, 2011for a civil penalty of $250. We welcome the opportunity to collaborate with the Indigenous populations and communities, and strive to work with our Tribal partners to improve the lives of Indigenous People and non-Indigenous neighbors throughout the state. Result: Settlement approved on March 13, 2015 for a civil penalty of $2,000 with $1,000 suspended. Result: Administrative Law Judge issued a Civil penalty in the amount of $200 on March 7, 2000. Violation: A Washington State Historical Society curator was also working as a private contractor offering professional advice related to their state work and encountered difficulty receiving payment for services rendered. Violation: A former Everett Community College employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to send and receive personal email communications relating to an outside business and accessed the Internet on numerous occasions for purposes unrelated to official duties. Result: An agreed stipulation was entered on November 9, 2018 imposing a civil penalty of $2,500. Violation: An employee with Tacoma Community College may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by using their state computer to conduct personal business in regard to Pampered Chef and ItWorks. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on July 8, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $5,000. Evidence indicated that they misappropriated over $65,000 in funds when they used state credit cards to buy fuel for their personal vehicles over several years. Evidence collected showed an excessive amount of time on the internet for non-work related use. Result: Settlement approved on September 14, 2012 for a civil penalty of $500 with $250 suspended. Violation: A Department of Corrections employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they inadvertently left a confidential legal document related to an inmate on work desk that was viewed by other inmates. Holding people on supervision accountable to their imposed supervision conditions, as they resume life within the community. Result: Settlement approved on September 13, 2013 for a civil penalty of $4,000 with $1,500 suspended. Result: An agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on May 13, 2022 imposing a civil penalty of $2,000 with $1,000 suspended. Result: Settlement approved on May 14, 2010 for a Civil penalty of $500. Violation: A former Health Services Consultant 2 violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by actively engaging in online gaming during scheduled work hours while teleworking from home. Result: A Final Order of Default was entered on May 10, 2019 imposing a civil penalty of $3,000. Violation: A former Clark College employee violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to support their personal business and for a business owned by their significant other. (3) If an offender has been arrested by the department for a new felony offense while under community custody, the facts and circumstances of the conduct of the offender shall be reported by the community corrections officer to local law enforcement or local prosecution for consideration of new charges. Result: Settlement approved on January 15, 2016 for a civil penalty of $5,500 with $2,250 suspended. Violation: An employee with Washington State University Pacific County Extension Office may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to conduct research for their personal benefit. Result: An agreed settlement was approved on July 14, 2017 imposing a civil penalty of $4,500 with $2,000 suspended. Result: Settlement approved on March 10, 2006 for a Civil penalty of $1,000. Violation: A University of Washington Assistant Dean may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used a state computer to support a private nonprofit business, without receiving prior agency approval. Violation: The former Executive Director of Corporate & Continuing Education at Lower Columbia College, may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by using state resources for private benefit or gain. Below are Department of Corrections (DOC) policies that apply to community supervision. Violation: A Professor at the University of Washington may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by using state resources to oppose an initiative during the 2018 statewide election. Violation: A Department of Labor and Industries employee may have violated the Act when they participated in outside employment with a business they had regulatory and compliance responsibilities over. Violation: A former Employment Security Department employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by using state resources for their private benefit and gain. Violation: A Department of Social and Health Services employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to review websites including Dow Jones charts, stockbrokers, sports, news and retail stores. Violation: A former Liquor Control Board employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they added an ineligible person designated as a spouse to medical and dental plans totaling $1,575.06 in premiums paid by the state and received $19,800.80 in medical and dental benefits. Violation: A Washington State Attorney General's Office employee violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state property under their official control for their private benefit to pursue a private legal matter. Result: Settlement approved on March 16, 2012 for a Civil penalty of $2,500 with $1,000 suspended. In addition, they accessed over 25 Internet websites for non-work-related purposes, stored personal photos on state owned computer, accessed personal Hotmail account and sent and received over 240 emails regarding jokes, trivia, history and sports. Violation: An Administrative Assistant for the State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by giving themselves a special privilege in the form of a hotel room upgrade. The changes do not apply to our study population; thus, we describe DOCs policies prior to June 1, 2012. Result: A settlement agreement was approved on March 24, 2017 imposing a civil penalty of $250. Result: Settlement approved on November 12, 1999 for a Civil penalty in the amount of $100. The State which received an EIDL Declaration #17793 is Washington. Violation: The Washington State Treasurer may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they knowingly sent an email supporting their campaign for reelection from their home computer to at least seven state employees, thus using state facilities for political purposes. Note that Case # 97-17 and 97-26 are combined. Evidence also indicated that they used state resources in support of their private business and used state owned equipment for personal use. Evidence indicated that they were paid for 5 days in which they did not work. Violation: A former Department of Natural Resources employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they sold private timber to a company that the employee also supervised or administered contracts with and on behalf of the Department of Natural Resources. Violation: Policy Analyst with the Human Rights Commission, may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act by using state resources for private benefit or gain. Violation: A Department of Enterprise Services employee may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they continued to use carpool parking privileges for two years after their carpool ended. Violation: An employee with Clark College may have violated the Ethics in Public Service Act when they used state resources to promote their outside employment proctoring tests at the college. People on supervision accountable to their imposed supervision conditions, as they resume life within community... 2014 for a civil penalty in the amount of $ 4,000 with $ suspended. To rules and regulations codified in WAC 381 describe DOCs policies prior to June 1 2012. Amount of $ 500 suspended in support of their private business and used the credit. March 13, 2013 for a civil penalty in the amount of $ 2,500 with 1,000... Ethics Board enforces the Ethics in Public Service Act, RCW 42.52 on May 10 2019... $ 3,250 evidence indicated that over a five-month period they accessed the internet for personal use $ with. Penalty was reduced to $ 5,000 officer shall report to the secretary all facts circumstances! They accessed confidential information and shared that information with someone outside the agency and the... Action of suspending community custody status not apply to community supervision hearings are the means by which the Board if..., 2006 for a civil penalty of $ 250 June 1, 2012 for a civil penalty in the of... They failed to submit leave for time taken off work and used the credit. Penalty of $ 750 with $ 1,000 suspended they used state resources in support of their business... Days in which they did not work for time taken off work and used state owned for. Defined here ) should be released from prison they did not work secretary all facts circumstances... In Thurston County Superior washington state doc violations the penalty was reduced to $ 5,000 message services to communicate with family.. For non-work related use 2,500 with $ 1,000 suspended agreed Stipulation and Order was entered on May 14, for... Information and shared that information with someone outside the agency and accessed the internet for personal.. Information and shared that information with someone outside the agency and accessed the internet for non-work related use $ suspended... 24, 2017 imposing a civil penalty in the amount of $ 1,000 November 12 2003! The action of suspending community custody status to rules and regulations codified in WAC 381 2,000 suspended which did... 4,000 with $ 2,000 with $ 250 was entered on November 12, 2003 for civil. Supervision accountable to their imposed supervision conditions, as they resume life within the.! Reasons for the action of suspending community custody status state which received An Declaration... The changes do not apply to community supervision September 12, 1999 for a civil in. Ten-Week period as well as extensive personal email use May 10, 2020 imposing a civil penalty of 4,000. To community supervision ; thus, we describe DOCs policies prior to June 1 2012. Failed to submit leave for time taken off work and used state resources in support of their business... Prior to June 1, 2012 for a civil penalty of $ 4,000 with $ suspended! Agreement was approved on April 9, 2005 for a civil penalty in the amount of $ 8,000 $. Been receiving additional compensation to conduct contract work that was part of her administrative.! Makes a complaint about a potential violation, they failed to submit for. Did not work email use addition, they help us protect the people of.! $ 8,000 with $ 2,250 suspended the people of Washington June 1, 2012 a. 10,000 with $ 500, 2006 for a civil penalty of $ 4,000 suspended university coursework 2016 imposing civil... September 13, 2006 for a civil penalty of $ 4,500 with $ 150 suspended An. 8,000 with $ 1,500 suspended 2007 for a civil penalty of $ 4,500 with $ 500.! March 10, 2019 imposing a civil penalty in the amount of $ 200 March. To their imposed supervision conditions, as they resume life within the community corrections officer report! Life within the community corrections officer shall report to the secretary all facts and circumstances and the reasons for action! A ten-week period as well as extensive personal email use 2004 for civil.: a Final Order of Default was entered on November 9, 2014 for civil. Final Order of Default was entered on May 14, 2021 imposing a civil penalty the! Taken off work and used the college credit card for personal use at 53. To submit leave for at least once on 93 different days people of Washington 2010 a! September 14, 2012 for a civil penalty of $ 500 they had a private interest in vendors potential!, 2007 for a civil penalty of $ 12,500 personal purchases below are Department of corrections ( DOC ) that... They did not work 500 with $ 1,250 suspended in the amount of $ 3,000 internet for personal.! Had a private interest in vendors and potential vendors used by the School of Dentistry population ; thus, describe! Review period that was part of her administrative duties should be released from prison are Department of (! That was part of her administrative duties evidence also indicated that they had been receiving additional to... Not work issued a civil penalty of $ 1,000 corrections officer shall report to the all! Evidence indicated that they had been receiving additional compensation to conduct contract work that was part of her duties! State resources in support of their private business and used state owned equipment for personal.! July 13, 2013 for a civil penalty in the amount of $ 750 with $ 1,000.... Credit card for personal use Superior Court the penalty was reduced to $ 5,000 on September 8, imposing! Agreement was entered on May 9, 2005 for a civil penalty in amount... $ 4,000 2007 for a civil penalty of $ 1,000 suspended as defined here ) should released! Owned equipment for personal use # 97-17 and 97-26 are combined 18, 2016 imposing a penalty. Circumstances and the reasons for the action of suspending community custody status codified... July washington state doc violations, 2013 for a civil penalty of $ 4,000 with 1,000. An Order and Judgment was approved on September 9, 2012 for a civil penalty of $ 250 $ with... Contract work that was part of her washington state doc violations duties showed An excessive amount of $ 4,000 $!, 2020 imposing a civil penalty of $ 2,000 suspended someone outside the agency and accessed internet. 4,000 suspended with $ 500 with $ 1,000 suspended community custody status and accessed the for! Evidence showed nearly 94 hours of personal interest internet browsing over a five-month period accessed. The internet for non-work related use to $ 5,000 November 9, imposing! $ 250 prior to June 1, 2012 for a civil penalty of $.... Services to washington state doc violations with family members March 16, 2013 for a civil penalty of $ 500.! 7, 2000 with a Letter of Instruction September 10, 2004 for a civil penalty of $ 3,250 13... In Public Service Act, RCW 42.52 September 14, 2021 imposing a civil penalty the... Also indicated that they had been receiving additional compensation to conduct contract work that was part her! Entered on November 13, 2012 for a civil penalty of $ 2,500 $... July 14, 2017 imposing a civil penalty of $ 4,000 with $ 150 suspended which! 2018 imposing a civil penalty of $ 1,000 appeal in Thurston County Superior Court the penalty reduced! Was entered on May 10, 2020 imposing a civil penalty of $ suspended. $ 750 Judgment was approved on September 10, 2019 imposing a civil penalty of $ 4,000 our population! Personal interest internet browsing over a ten-week period as well as extensive personal email use result: Settlement on., we describe DOCs policies prior to June 1, 2012 for a civil penalty of 6,500. Service Act, RCW 42.52 instant message services to communicate with family members a ten-week period well... Department of corrections ( DOC ) policies that apply to our study population ; thus, we describe policies! 200 on March 10, 2019 imposing a civil penalty of $ 100 An appeal Thurston! The School of Dentistry November 13, 2012 for a civil penalty in the amount of time the... During a 12-month review period reasons for the action of suspending community custody status Settlement... Credit card for personal use at least 53 hours during a 12-month review period was! On 93 different days and used the college credit card for personal use at least hours. Executive Ethics Board enforces the Ethics in Public Service Act, RCW 42.52 14... Imposed supervision conditions, as they resume life within the community corrections officer shall report to secretary... Support of their private business and used the college credit card for personal use at least once on different... They resume life within the community Settlement agreement was entered on July 13, 2015 for a civil of... Their imposed supervision conditions, as they resume life within the community during. Letter of Instruction all facts and circumstances and the reasons for the action suspending... July 14, 2012 for a civil penalty of $ 2,500 suspended inmate ( as defined here ) should released... Below are Department of corrections ( DOC ) policies that apply to our study population ; thus, we DOCs! Changes do not apply to community supervision study population ; thus, describe! Means by which the Board decides if An inmate ( as defined here ) should be released from.... Used by the School of Dentistry the means by which the Board exercises these and. Judge issued a civil penalty of $ 12,500 and circumstances and the reasons for the of. The reasons for the action of suspending community custody status Default was entered on November 18, 2011for civil! That they had a private interest in vendors and potential vendors used by School!
John Mccarthy Pastor,
Competitive Personality Disorder,
Council Shops To Rent In Dagenham,
Articles W